The Setup: We are given the equation 4log2x−4x+9log3y−16y+68=0. We need to evaluate the expression y−x.
Step 1: Simplify the logarithmic terms using the base-change exponent identity alogab=b.
For the first term:
4log2x=(22)log2x=22log2x=2log2(x2)=x2
For the third term:
9log3y=(32)log3y=32log3y=3log3(y2)=y2Step 2: Substitute the simplified terms back into the algebraic equation.
x2−4x+y2−16y+68=0Step 3: Complete the square for both the x and y variables.
Isolate the respective variables and add the required constants:
(x2−4x+4)+(y2−16y+64)=0(x−2)2+(y−8)2=0
Note that 4+64=68, which perfectly balances the original constant.
Step 4: Solve for x and y.
The sum of two real squares equals zero if and only if each independent square evaluates to zero.
x−2=0⇒x=2y−8=0⇒y=8
Both values are strictly positive, satisfying the logarithmic domain restrictions.
Step 5: Calculate the final target expression y−x.
8−2=6Final Answer: 6
A fruit seller has oranges, apples, and bananas in the ratio 3:6:7. If the number of oranges is a multiple of both 5 and 6, then the minimum number of fruits the seller has is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: A fruit seller has oranges, apples, and bananas in a ratio of 3:6:7. The quantity of oranges is a multiple of both 5 and 6, and we must find the minimum total number of fruits.
Step 1: Define the quantities using a common scaling factor. Let k be a positive integer.
Oranges = 3k
Apples = 6k
Bananas = 7k
Total Fruits = 3k+6k+7k=16kStep 2: Apply the divisibility constraint to the number of oranges.
The quantity of oranges (3k) must be a multiple of both 5 and 6.
Calculate the Least Common Multiple (LCM) of 5 and 6:
LCM(5,6)=30
Therefore, 3k must be a multiple of 30.
Step 3: Determine the minimum valid scaling factor k.
Let m be a positive integer such that:
3k=30m⇒k=10m
To minimize the total number of fruits, we must minimize k, which occurs when m=1. Thus, k=10.
Step 4: Calculate the total number of fruits using the minimal scale factor.
Total=16(10)=160Final Answer: 160
The number of real solutions of the equation (x2−15x+55)x2−5x+6=1 is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We must find the number of real solutions for the exponential equation (x2−15x+55)x2−5x+6=1.
Step 1: Evaluate Condition 1 where the exponent is 0 and the base is non-zero.
x2−5x+6=0(x−2)(x−3)=0
This yields potential solutions x=2 and x=3. We must verify the base is non-zero for these values:
For x=2, base = 22−15(2)+55=29=0. (Valid)
For x=3, base = 32−15(3)+55=19=0. (Valid)
Step 2: Evaluate Condition 2 where the base is exactly 1.
x2−15x+55=1x2−15x+54=0(x−6)(x−9)=0
This yields solutions x=6 and x=9. Both are valid for any real exponent.
Step 3: Evaluate Condition 3 where the base is −1 and the exponent is an even integer.
x2−15x+55=−1x2−15x+56=0(x−7)(x−8)=0
This yields potential solutions x=7 and x=8. We must verify the exponent is even:
For x=7, exponent = 72−5(7)+6=49−35+6=20. (Even ⇒ Valid)
For x=8, exponent = 82−5(8)+6=64−40+6=30. (Even ⇒ Valid)
Step 4: Aggregate all valid real solutions.
The complete set of solutions is {2,3,6,9,7,8}.
Counting these unique values yields 6 distinct solutions.
Final Answer: 6
The following table shows the number of employees and their median age in eight companies located in a district.
Company
Number of employees
Median age
A
32
24
B
28
30
C
43
39
D
39
45
E
35
49
F
29
54
G
23
59
H
16
63
It is known that the age of all employees are integers. It is known that the age of every employee in A is strictly less than the age of every employee in B, the age of every employee in B is strictly less than the age of every employee in C, ..., the age of every employee in G is strictly less than the age of every employee in H.
The highest possible age of an employee of company A is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: Think of these companies as sorted C++ arrays. We need to maximize the final element of array A without throwing a logic error when it's compared to the very first element of array B. It's a strict inequality check, so we need to min-max the data to push Company A's ceiling as high as possible.
Step 1: Decode the median mechanics for Company B. Company B has 28 employees (an even number). The median age (30) is the average of the two middle elements. If we use standard 1-based math indexing, that's the 14th and 15th employees:
2b14+b15=30Step 2: Find the lowest possible starting age for Company B. To give array A the most room to scale up, we must push B's values as low as the rules allow. We can initialize the first 15 elements in B to exactly 30 without breaking the median requirement: b1=b2=⋯=b14=b15=30.
Thus, the absolute minimum age for the youngest employee in B is 30.
Step 3: Lock in Company A's max age. The constraint dictates that *every* employee in A must be strictly younger than *every* employee in B. In code terms, a32<b1. Since ages are strictly typed integers, if b1=30, the absolute maximum allowed for a32 is 29.
Step 4: Verify this doesn't break Company A's own median constraint. Company A has 32 employees with a median of 24. This requires the average of a16 and a17 to be 24. We can easily assign a16=24 and a17=24, which leaves plenty of capacity for elements a18 through a32 to cap out at 29. The backend logic runs with zero lag, and the max age holds up perfectly.
Final Answer: 29
Person A borrows Rs. 4000 from another person B for a duration of 4 years. He borrows a portion of it at 3% simple interest per annum, while the rest at 4% simple interest per annum. If B gets Rs. 520 as total interest, then the amount A borrowed at 3% per annum in Rs. is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: Person A borrows Rs. 4000 for 4 years, splitting the principal between a 3% simple interest rate and a 4% simple interest rate. The total interest earned is Rs. 520, and we must find the amount borrowed at 3%.
Step 1: Define the variables for the split principal.
Let x represent the principal amount borrowed at the 3% rate.
Let 4000−x represent the remaining principal borrowed at the 4% rate.
Step 2: Calculate the annualized interest yield.
The total interest accrued over 4 years is 520. Because it is simple interest, the annual interest is constant:
Annual Interest=4520=130Step 3: Construct the linear equation for the annual interest.
0.03x+0.04(4000−x)=130Step 4: Solve for x.
Distribute the terms and isolate the variable:
0.03x+160−0.04x=130−0.01x=−30x=3000Final Answer: 3000
Q6:ipmat indore 2024QA › TrianglesEasySA · TITA
The number of triangles with integer sides and with perimeter 15 is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We need to calculate the total number of triangles that can be formed with integer sides and a fixed perimeter of 15.
Step 1: Define the basic parameters and constraints.
Let the integer sides of the triangle be a, b, and c, strictly ordered such that a≤b≤c.
The perimeter condition dictates:
a+b+c=15Step 2: Apply the triangle inequality theorem to bound the longest side c.
The sum of the two shorter sides must strictly exceed the longest side:
a+b>c
Substitute a+b=15−c into the inequality:
15−c>c⇒2c<15⇒c≤7.5
Since c is an integer, the maximum valid dimension for c is 7.
Furthermore, c is the maximum side, so it must be at least the average length of the perimeter:
c≥315=5
Thus, c∈{5,6,7}.
Step 3: Systematically evaluate integer pairs (a,b) for each possible value of c, maintaining a≤b≤c.
Case 1:c=5
Requires a+b=10. The only integer pair satisfying a≤b≤5 is (5,5). (Yields 1 triangle)
Case 2:c=6
Requires a+b=9. The pairs satisfying a≤b≤6 are (3,6) and (4,5). (Yields 2 triangles)
Case 3:c=7
Requires a+b=8. The pairs satisfying a≤b≤7 are (1,7), (2,6), (3,5), and (4,4). (Yields 4 triangles)
Step 4: Aggregate the valid triangle formations.
Total Triangles=1+2+4=7Final Answer: 7
If A=x1y1z1x2y287y33 is a matrix such that the sum of all three elements along any row, column or diagonal are equal to each other, then the value of determinant of A is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: A 3×3 matrix is given with elements [x1,x2,7], [y1,y2,y3], and [z1,8,3] such that the sums across any row, column, or diagonal are identical. We must find its determinant.
Step 1: Determine the magic sum S and the center element.
Let S equal the constant sum of any row, column, or diagonal.
Analyze the bottom row:
z1+8+3=S⇒z1=S−11
Analyze the right-to-left diagonal:
7+y2+z1=S
Substitute z1 into the diagonal equation:
7+y2+(S−11)=S⇒y2−4=0⇒y2=4
In a 3×3 magic square, the central element is always exactly 31 of the magic sum.
S=3(y2)=12Step 2: Populate the remaining elements of matrix A using S=12.
From Step 1, z1=12−11=1.
Left-to-Right Diagonal:
x1+y2+3=12⇒x1+4+3=12⇒x1=5
Top Row:
5+x2+7=12⇒x2=0
Left Column:
5+y1+1=12⇒y1=6
Right Column:
7+y3+3=12⇒y3=2Step 3: Construct the populated matrix A.
A=561048723Step 4: Calculate the determinant ∣A∣ by expanding along the top row.
∣A∣=5((4)(3)−(8)(2))−0+7((6)(8)−(1)(4))∣A∣=5(12−16)+7(48−4)∣A∣=5(−4)+7(44)=−20+308=288Final Answer: 288
The number of factors of 1800 that are multiple of 6 is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We are asked to determine the number of factors of the integer 1800 that are also multiples of 6.
Step 1: Extract the prime factorization of 1800.
1800=18×100=(2×32)×(22×52)1800=23×32×52
Any generic factor of 1800 takes the structure 2a×3b×5c, where constraints are 0≤a≤3, 0≤b≤2, and 0≤c≤2.
Step 2: Apply the multiple-of-6 constraint to the exponents.
Because 6=21×31, any factor that is a multiple of 6 must include at least one 2 and at least one 3 in its prime factorization.
The restricted exponent ranges become:
a∈{1,2,3} (yielding 3 valid choices)
b∈{1,2} (yielding 2 valid choices)
c∈{0,1,2} (yielding 3 valid choices, as 5 is unconstrained)
Step 3: Calculate the combinatorics of the restricted factor set.
Multiply the independent choices together:
Total Factors=3×2×3=18Final Answer: 18
Q9:ipmat indore 2024QA › Mean, Median & ModeEasySA · TITA
The following table shows the number of employees and their median age in eight companies located in a district.
Company
Number of employees
Median age
A
32
24
B
28
30
C
43
39
D
39
45
E
35
49
F
29
54
G
23
59
H
16
63
It is known that the age of all employees are integers. It is known that the age of every employee in A is strictly less than the age of every employee in B, the age of every employee in B is strictly less than the age of every employee in C, ..., the age of every employee in G is strictly less than the age of every employee in H.
The median age of employees across the eight companies is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We are looking for the global median of a massive, perfectly sorted dataset. Since we know the strict hierarchical order of the companies (A<B<C…), the entire server population is already sorted in ascending order. We just need to locate exactly which company houses the middle employee and extract their stats. It is an absolute 'Where's Waldo?' situation, but with array indices.
Step 1: Calculate the total server population. We sum up all employees across the companies to find our N:
32+28+43+39+35+29+23+16=245Step 2: Find the index of the global median. Since the total N is odd (245), the median is simply the exact middle value in the sorted list.
2245+1=123
We need to find the exact target coordinates for the 123rd employee overall.
Step 3: Track the cumulative frequencies to locate the target's spawn zone.
* Company A: 32 employees (Cumulative: 32)
* Company B: 28 employees (Cumulative: 32+28=60)
* Company C: 43 employees (Cumulative: 60+43=103)
* Company D: 39 employees (Cumulative: 103+39=142)
Since 103<123≤142, the 123rd employee lives right inside Company D's roster.
Step 4: Pinpoint the exact age of this specific NPC. The 123rd employee overall is exactly the 20th employee within Company D (since 123−103=20).
Company D has exactly 39 employees. Let's find Company D's local median index:
239+1=20
The 20th employee *is* the exact median of Company D! Since the table explicitly states the median age of Company D is 45, the 20th employee's age is hard-locked at 45.
Final Answer: 45
Q10:ipmat indore 2024QA › TrianglesEasySA · TITA
Let △ABC be a triangle right-angled at B with AB=BC=18. The area of the largest rectangle that can be inscribed in this triangle and has B as one of the vertices is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: A right-angled triangle has vertex B at the right angle, with legs AB=BC=18. We need to find the area of the largest inscribed rectangle sharing vertex B.
Step 1: Establish the coordinate system.
Place the right-angled vertex B at the origin (0,0).
Given leg lengths AB=BC=18, set vertex A at (0,18) and vertex C at (18,0).
The hypotenuse AC forms a line passing through (0,18) and (18,0). Its linear equation is:
x+y=18⇒y=18−xStep 2: Define the area function of the inscribed rectangle.
A rectangle sharing vertex B at (0,0) and bounded by the triangle will have its opposing vertex (x,y) strictly on the hypotenuse AC.
The Area (A) is the product of its length and width:
Arect=x×y=x(18−x)=18x−x2Step 3: Maximize the quadratic area function.
The function is a downward-opening parabola. We find its maximum via differentiation (or the vertex formula x=2a−b):
dxdArect=18−2x=0⇒x=9Step 4: Calculate the maximum area footprint.
Substitute x=9 into the bounding equation to find y:
y=18−9=9Max Area=9×9=81Final Answer: 81
Q11:ipmat indore 2024QA › ModulusMediumSA · TITA
The number of pairs (x,y) of integers satisfying the inequality ∣x−5∣+∣y−5∣≤6 is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We must find the number of integer coordinate pairs (x,y) that satisfy the absolute value inequality ∣x−5∣+∣y−5∣≤6.
Step 1: Translate the bounded region to center it at the origin.
Let u=x−5 and v=y−5. Since x and y are elements of Z, u and v must also be elements of Z.
Substitute into the inequality:
∣u∣+∣v∣≤6
This bounded region forms a solid square rotated 45∘ on the Cartesian plane.
Step 2: Apply the lattice point summation formula for Manhattan boundaries.
The exact number of integer coordinate pairs (u,v) satisfying ∣u∣+∣v∣≤k for an integer k≥0 is governed by the discrete sequence formula 2k(k+1)+1.
Step 3: Evaluate the formula for the target boundary distance k=6.
Total Pairs=2(6)(6+1)+1Total Pairs=2(6)(7)+1=84+1=85
Because the translation mapping (x,y)→(u,v) is a bijective 1:1 map, the count remains identical for the original uncentered inequality.
Final Answer: 85
Q12:ipmat indore 2024QA › Mean, Median & ModeEasySA · TITA
The following table shows the number of employees and their median age in eight companies located in a district.
Company
Number of employees
Median age
A
32
24
B
28
30
C
43
39
D
39
45
E
35
49
F
29
54
G
23
59
H
16
63
It is known that the age of all employees are integers. It is known that the age of every employee in A is strictly less than the age of every employee in B, the age of every employee in B is strictly less than the age of every employee in C, ..., the age of every employee in G is strictly less than the age of every employee in H.
In company F, the lowest possible sum of the ages of all employees is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: This is a pure min-max puzzle. We need to minimize the total sum of an array while anchored by a fixed median and bounded by a strict lower limit from the previous dataset (Company E). We are basically min-maxing a character build for the absolute lowest possible stats to clear this challenge.
Step 1: Analyze Company F's required median. Company F has 29 employees. The median index is:
229+1=15
So, the 15th employee's age must be exactly 54 (from the table). To minimize the total sum, all employees from index 15 to 29 should be exactly 54 years old. Going any higher is an automatic L for our minimum sum objective.
Step 2: Find the absolute minimum age for the first 14 employees in F. Because of the strict inequality rule, the youngest person in F must be strictly older than the oldest person in E.
f1>e35
We need to shrink E's oldest age as much as possible to give F a lower floor. Company E has 35 employees with a median age of 49. The median is the 18th employee.
We can set E's entire upper half to exactly 49:
e18=e19=⋯=e35=49
So, the maximum age in E can be successfully nerfed down to 49.
Step 3: Set the lower half of F's ages. Since f1>e35, and e35=49, the lowest possible valid integer age for any employee in Company F is 50.
We generously assign this bare minimum age to all employees below F's median:
f1=f2=⋯=f14=50Step 4: Calculate the final minimized sum for Company F.
We have 14 employees at age 50, and 15 employees (the median and everyone above) at age 54.
Sum=(14×50)+(15×54)Sum=700+810=1510Final Answer: 1510
Q13:ipmat indore 2024QA › Set TheoryEasySA · TITA
In a group of 150 students, 52 like tea, 48 like juice and 62 like coffee. If each student in the group likes at least one among tea, juice and coffee, then the maximum number of students that like more than one drink is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: Out of 150 students, 52 like tea, 48 like juice, and 62 like coffee. Since everyone likes at least one drink, we must maximize the number of students who like more than one drink.
Step 1: Define the cardinalities of the sets.
Let the subsets of students be T (Tea), J (Juice), and C (Coffee).
∣T∣=52, ∣J∣=48, and ∣C∣=62.
The sum of independent choices is 52+48+62=162.
Because every student likes at least one drink, the total union encapsulates the whole group: ∣T∪J∪C∣=150.
Step 2: Construct the overlapping set union equation.
Let x denote the exact count of students liking precisely two drinks.
Let y denote the exact count of students liking precisely three drinks.
The Inclusion-Exclusion Principle formula for exact counts states:
∣T∪J∪C∣=(∣T∣+∣J∣+∣C∣)−x−2y150=162−x−2y⇒x+2y=12Step 3: Formulate and execute the optimization constraint.
We must maximize the parameter of students liking *more than one* drink, which equates mathematically to maximizing the sum (x+y).
Rewrite (x+y) by isolating x in our established equation (x=12−2y):
x+y=(12−2y)+y=12−y
To maximize the function (12−y), we must apply the minimum valid boundary for y. Since cardinalities must be non-negative integers, the minimum for y is 0.
Step 4: Evaluate the maximum value.
If y=0, then x=12.
Max(x+y)=12+0=12Final Answer: 12
The price of a chocolate is increased by x% and then reduced by x%. The new price is 96.76% of the original price. Then x is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: A chocolate's price undergoes a sequential x% increase followed by an x% decrease. The resulting price is 96.76% of the original price, and we must determine the value of x.
Step 1: Construct the sequential price multiplier function.
Let P represent the baseline price.
An x% increase applies a multiplier of (1+100x).
An x% decrease applies a subsequent multiplier of (1−100x).
New Price=P×(1+100x)×(1−100x)Step 2: Simplify via the difference of squares identity.
New Price=P(1−10000x2)Step 3: Equate to the provided net proportional change.
The final state is 96.76% (or 0.9676) of P.
P(1−10000x2)=0.9676P
Divide out P from both sides since initial price is arbitrary:
1−10000x2=0.9676Step 4: Solve for the absolute rate x.
10000x2=1−0.9676=0.0324x2=324
Because a percentage rate scaling magnitude must be positive, take the principal square root:
x=18Final Answer: 18
Let f and g be two functions defined by f(x)=∣x+∣x∣∣ and g(x)=x1 for x=0. If f(a)+g(f(a))=613 for some real a, then the maximum possible value off(g(a)) is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We are given the functions f(x)=∣x+∣x∣∣ and g(x)=1/x for non-zero x. Based on the constraint f(a)+g(f(a))=13/6, we must find the maximum possible value of f(g(a)).
Step 1: Analyze the piecewise domains of f(x)=∣x+∣x∣∣.
If x≤0, then ∣x∣=−x⇒f(x)=∣x−x∣=0.
If x>0, then ∣x∣=x⇒f(x)=∣x+x∣=2x.
Step 2: Ascertain the domain of a using the given composite equation.
The given condition is f(a)+g(f(a))=613.
The function g(x)=x1 is fundamentally undefined at 0. Consequently, f(a) cannot equal 0.
By our piecewise analysis, if f(a)=0, then a must be strictly positive (a>0), locking f(a)=2a.
Step 3: Formulate and solve the rational equation for a.
Substitute f(a)=2a into the equation:
2a+g(2a)=6132a+2a1=613
Let u=2a to clarify the quadratic structure:
u+u1=613
Multiply entirely by 6u:
6u2+6=13u⇒6u2−13u+6=0
Factor the resulting quadratic:
(2u−3)(3u−2)=0
Thus, u=23 or u=32.
Because u=2a, we trace back to two valid positive candidates for a:
a=43ora=31Step 4: Evaluate the maximization query for f(g(a)).
Since a>0, g(a)=a1>0. Any positive input to f triggers the 2x piecewise condition.
f(g(a))=f(a1)=2(a1)=a2
Evaluate against both derived candidates of a:
If a=43⇒3/42=38≈2.67
If a=31⇒1/32=6
The strict mathematical maximum is 6.
Final Answer: 6