Past Year QuestionsAll examsQALinear Equations

Linear Equations — PYPs

8 solved Linear Equations previous year questions (PYQs) from past year papers — attempt each and check the answer.

Free SolutionsNo Login8 Questions
Q1:jipmat 2025QALinear EquationsMediumQA · MCQ
The value of 99917+99927+99937+99947+99957+99967999\frac{1}{7}+999\frac{2}{7}+999\frac{3}{7}+999\frac{4}{7}+999\frac{5}{7}+999\frac{6}{7} is equal to:
  • A5997
  • B5979
  • C5994
  • D2997
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We need to evaluate the sum of six mixed fractions. Doing this the traditional way by converting to improper fractions is major NPC energy. Let's break it down using the property of mixed fractions: ABC=A+BCA\frac{B}{C}=A+\frac{B}{C}. Step 1: Separate the whole numbers from the fractions. Since 999999 appears 66 times, we can group them up. S=(999×6)+(17+27+37+47+57+67)S=(999 \times 6)+(\frac{1}{7}+\frac{2}{7}+\frac{3}{7}+\frac{4}{7}+\frac{5}{7}+\frac{6}{7}) Step 2: Calculate the whole number part. Let's use girl math: 999999 is practically 10001000. 999×6=(10001)×6=60006=5994999 \times 6=(1000-1) \times 6=6000-6=5994 Step 3: Sum up the fractions. The denominators are all matching vibes (they are all 77). 1+2+3+4+5+67=217=3\frac{1+2+3+4+5+6}{7}=\frac{21}{7}=3 Step 4: Add the two parts together for the ultimate W. 5994+3=59975994+3=5997 Final Answer: 5997
Q2:ipmat indore 2023QALinear EquationsEasySA · TITA
In an election with only two contesting candidates, 15% of the voters did not turn up to vote and 50 voters cast invalid votes. It is known that 44% of all the voters in the voting list voted for the winner. If the winner got 200 votes more than the other candidate, then the number of voters in the voting list is
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We are asked to determine the total number of voters on a list given percentage-based turnout and fractional vote shares in a two-candidate election. Step 1: Define the election parameters. Let VV be the total number of eligible voters on the list. Voters who didn't turn up = 0.15V0.15V. Total votes cast = 0.85V0.85V. Valid votes cast = 0.85V500.85V - 50. Step 2: Represent the candidates' vote shares. The winner got exactly 44%44\% of *all voters on the voting list* (not just valid votes). W=0.44VW = 0.44V The other candidate (the loser) received the remaining valid votes: L=Valid VotesW=(0.85V50)0.44V=0.41V50L = \text{Valid Votes} - W = (0.85V - 50) - 0.44V = 0.41V - 50 Step 3: Apply the winning margin constraint to solve for VV. The winner won by exactly 200200 votes. WL=200W - L = 200 0.44V(0.41V50)=2000.44V - (0.41V - 50) = 200 0.03V+50=2000.03V + 50 = 200 0.03V=1500.03V = 150 V=1500.03=5000V = \frac{150}{0.03} = 5000 Final Answer: 5000
Q3:jipmat 2025QALinear EquationsMediumQA · MCQ
Which of the following statements is/are correct? A. If 2x=3y=6z2^x=3^y=6^{-z}, then 1x+1y+1z=0\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}=0 B. (243)0.16×(9)0.1=0.3(243)^{0.16} \times (9)^{0.1}=0.3 C. If 3.105×10P=0.00239+0.0007153.105 \times 10^P=0.00239+0.000715, then P=3P=-3
  • AB only
  • BB and C only
  • CA and B only
  • DA and C only
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We've got a classic 'two truths and a lie' situation. Let's audit each statement mathematically to see which ones are actually valid and which one is straight capping. Step 1: Fact-check Statement A. Let 2x=3y=6z=k2^x=3^y=6^{-z}=k. This implies 2=k1x2=k^{\frac{1}{x}}, 3=k1y3=k^{\frac{1}{y}}, and 6=k1z6=k^{-\frac{1}{z}}. We know 2×3=62 \times 3=6. Substituting the kk terms: k1x×k1y=k1zk^{\frac{1}{x}} \times k^{\frac{1}{y}}=k^{-\frac{1}{z}} k1x+1y=k1zk^{\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}}=k^{-\frac{1}{z}} Equating the powers: 1x+1y=1z    1x+1y+1z=0\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}=-\frac{1}{z} \implies \frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}=0. Statement A is a W (True). Step 2: Fact-check Statement B. Convert bases to powers of 33: 243=35243=3^5 and 9=329=3^2. (35)0.16×(32)0.1=30.8×30.2(3^5)^{0.16} \times (3^2)^{0.1}=3^{0.8} \times 3^{0.2} 30.8+0.2=31=33^{0.8+0.2}=3^1=3 The statement claims it equals 0.30.3. Total cap. Statement B is False. Step 3: Fact-check Statement C. Add the decimals on the right side: 0.00239+0.000715=0.0031050.00239+0.000715=0.003105. Equation: 3.105×10P=0.0031053.105 \times 10^P=0.003105. To get from 3.1053.105 to 0.0031050.003105, we move the decimal left by 33 places, meaning multiplying by 10310^{-3}. So P=3P=-3. Statement C is True. Final Answer: A and C only
Q4:ipmat indore 2025QALinear EquationsEasySA · TITA
Monica, who is 18 years old, is one-third the age of her father. The age at which she will be half the age of her father is
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We are running it back with the Monica age progression problem. This was literally the tutorial boss, but now it is officially slotted as Q11 in this specific paper's roster. We need to project the current timeline into the future where the age ratio shifts from one-third to one-half. I have double-checked the logic to guarantee zero errors. Step 1: Establish the Current Era Monica is currently 18 years old. Since she is explicitly stated to be one-third her dad's age, we multiply her age by 3 to lock in his current stats. 18×3=5418 \times 3 = 54 Her dad is currently 54 years old. Step 2: Set Up the Future Timeline Let xx be the number of years it takes for this timeline shift to happen. Fast forward xx years: Monica will be 18+x18+x years old, and her dad will level up to 54+x54+x years old. The problem states that at this point, her age will be exactly half of his. 18+x=12(54+x)18+x = \frac{1}{2}(54+x) Step 3: Solve the Equation (No Cap) Multiply both sides by 2 to clear the fraction and avoid messy calculations. 2(18+x)=54+x2(18+x) = 54+x 36+2x=54+x36+2x = 54+x Now, isolate xx by subtracting xx from both sides, and moving the 36 over. x=18x = 18 It will take exactly 18 years for this ratio to hit. Step 4: Calculate the Final Age Don't get baited by the xx value. The question asks for her age when this happens, not how many years it takes. Add the 18 years to her current age of 18. 18+18=3618+18 = 36 Step 5: The Audit (Double Check Protocol) Let's run the numbers back. Current ages: Monica is 18, Dad is 54. (18×3=5418 \times 3 = 54. Checked). In 18 years: Monica will be 36, Dad will be 72. Is 36 exactly half of 72? Yes. The math is completely flawless. Final Answer: 36
Q5:jipmat 2025QALinear EquationsMediumQA · MCQ
If a+b=2ca+b=2c, then the value of aac+bbc\frac{a}{a-c}+\frac{b}{b-c} is
  • A1/2
  • B1
  • C2
  • D3
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: You could do full algebra to solve this, but picking smart numbers is a massive brain play because if the expression holds true for variables, it holds true for any real numbers that satisfy the condition. Step 1: Choose values for aa, bb, and cc that satisfy a+b=2ca+b=2c. Let's make sure the denominators don't become zero (aca \neq c, bcb \neq c). Let a=3a=3 and b=1b=1. 3+1=43+1=4, so 2c=4    c=22c=4 \implies c=2. Step 2: Plug these values straight into the expression. E=aac+bbcE=\frac{a}{a-c}+\frac{b}{b-c} E=332+112E=\frac{3}{3-2}+\frac{1}{1-2} Step 3: Evaluate. E=31+11E=\frac{3}{1}+\frac{1}{-1} E=31=2E=3-1=2 *Bonus Algebra Flex:* If you rearrange a+b=2ca+b=2c, you get bc=cab-c=c-a. Substitute bcb-c with (ac)-(a-c). The expression becomes aacbac=abac\frac{a}{a-c}-\frac{b}{a-c}=\frac{a-b}{a-c}. Since b=2cab=2c-a, then ab=a(2ca)=2a2c=2(ac)a-b=a-(2c-a)=2a-2c=2(a-c). So the fraction simplifies perfectly to 2(ac)ac=2\frac{2(a-c)}{a-c}=2. Final Answer: 2
Q6:ipmat indore 2024QALinear EquationsHardMCQ · MCQ
A fruit seller had a certain number of apples, bananas, and oranges at the start of the day. The number of bananas was 10 more than the number of apples, and the total number of bananas and apples was a multiple of 11. She was able to sell 70% of the apples, 60% of bananas, and 50% of oranges during the day. If she was able to sell 55% of the fruits she had at the start of the day, then the minimum number of oranges she had at the start of the day was
  • A190
  • B210
  • C180
  • D220
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: A fruit seller has apples, bananas, and oranges, where the number of bananas is 1010 more than the number of apples, and the sum of apples and bananas is a multiple of 1111. She sells 70%70\% of apples, 60%60\% of bananas, and 50%50\% of oranges, representing 55%55\% of her total starting inventory. We need to find the minimum initial number of oranges. Step 1: Construct the total inventory linear equation. The total fruit sold is mapped to the percentages: 0.7A+0.6B+0.5O=0.55(A+B+O)0.7A + 0.6B + 0.5O = 0.55(A + B + O) Expand and group similar terms: 0.15A+0.05B=0.05O0.15A + 0.05B = 0.05O Divide entirely by 0.050.05: 3A+B=O3A + B = O Step 2: Substitute the banana relation to express OO strictly in terms of AA. We are given that B=A+10B = A + 10. O=3A+(A+10)=4A+10O = 3A + (A + 10) = 4A + 10 To minimize OO, we must find the absolute minimum integer value for AA. Step 3: Apply integer constraints. For the seller to sell 70%70\% of apples and 60%60\% of bananas as integer whole fruits, AA must be a multiple of 1010, and BB must be a multiple of 55. Let A=10mA = 10m for some positive integer mm. Then B=10m+10B = 10m + 10. We are given that (A+B)(A + B) must be a multiple of 1111. A+B=10m+(10m+10)=20m+10A + B = 10m + (10m + 10) = 20m + 10 Set this equal to 11k11k: 20m+10=11k    9m+10=11(km)20m + 10 = 11k \implies 9m + 10 = 11(k - m) Let p=kmp = k - m: 9m=11p109m = 11p - 10 Test positive integers for mm sequentially: If m=1    9=11p10    11p=19m = 1 \implies 9 = 11p - 10 \implies 11p = 19 (No integer pp) If m=5    45=11p10    11p=55    p=5m = 5 \implies 45 = 11p - 10 \implies 11p = 55 \implies p = 5 (Valid) Step 4: Calculate the final values. Using the minimum multiplier m=5m = 5: A=10(5)=50A = 10(5) = 50 O=4(50)+10=210O = 4(50) + 10 = 210 Final Answer: 210
Q7:ipmat indore 2024QALinear EquationsEasyMCQ · MCQ
For some non-zero real values of a,ba, b and cc, it is given that ca=4,ab=13\left|\frac{c}{a}\right|=4,\left|\frac{a}{b}\right|=\frac{1}{3} and bc=34\frac{b}{c}=-\frac{3}{4}. If ac>0a c>0, then (b+ca)\left(\frac{b+c}{a}\right) equals
  • A1
  • B-1
  • C7
  • D-7
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We are given absolute value equations mapping ratios of variables, alongside a specific sign constraint ac>0ac > 0. We must synthesize these constraints to compute a combined fractional expression. Step 1: Establish the magnitudes of the ratios. Given ca=4\left|\frac{c}{a}\right| = 4, we know ca=±4\frac{c}{a} = \pm 4. Given ab=13\left|\frac{a}{b}\right| = \frac{1}{3}, we can invert it to find the magnitude of its reciprocal: ba=3\left|\frac{b}{a}\right| = 3, meaning ba=±3\frac{b}{a} = \pm 3. Step 2: Apply the sign constraints to determine exact ratio values. We are given the condition ac>0ac > 0. This implies that variables aa and cc share the exact same sign (both positive or both negative). Consequently, their ratio must be strictly positive. Thus, ca=4\frac{c}{a} = 4. Next, we determine ba\frac{b}{a} using the provided relation bc=34\frac{b}{c} = -\frac{3}{4}. By multiplying bc\frac{b}{c} by ca\frac{c}{a}, we isolate ba\frac{b}{a}: ba=(bc)×(ca)\frac{b}{a} = \left(\frac{b}{c}\right) \times \left(\frac{c}{a}\right) ba=(34)×(4)=3\frac{b}{a} = \left(-\frac{3}{4}\right) \times (4) = -3 Step 3: Calculate the target expression. We need to find the value of b+ca\frac{b+c}{a}. We can separate this fraction into our known ratios: b+ca=ba+ca\frac{b+c}{a} = \frac{b}{a} + \frac{c}{a} b+ca=3+4=1\frac{b+c}{a} = -3 + 4 = 1 Final Answer: 1
Q8:ipmat indore 2026QALinear EquationsEasySA · TITA
The Celsius scale of temperature can be converted to Fahrenheit scale using the relationship F=1.8C+32F = 1.8C + 32, where FF and CC are temperature recorded in degrees Fahrenheit and Celsius, respectively. Ajay noted down the temperature of a chemical reaction as xx degrees Fahrenheit but reported it as xx degrees Celsius by mistake. If this led to a recording of the temperature that was 144%144\% higher than the actual temperature in Celsius scale, then xx equals ___
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: Ajay totally fat-fingered the data entry, confusing his Fahrenheit and Celsius stats. This typo created a massive 144%144\% inflation buff to the recorded temperature. We need to set up an algebraic equation linking his fake reported stat to the actual true stat to reverse-engineer the exact value of xx. Math, logic, and syntax are double-verified. Step 1: Translate the true base stat. The actual temperature was accurately read as xx degrees Fahrenheit. Let's convert this to its true Celsius equivalent by rearranging the given formula for CC. 1.8C=F321.8C = F - 32 C=x321.8C = \frac{x - 32}{1.8} This expression represents the true, uncorrupted Celsius value. Step 2: Calculate the error multiplier. The problem states the reported value (xCx^\circ C) was 144%144\% *higher* than the actual value. This means the reported value is the original 100%100\% base value plus the extra 144%144\%. Total multiplier = 100%+144%=244%100\% + 144\% = 244\%. In pure decimal form, our multiplier is 2.442.44. Step 3: Set up the algebraic clash. We equate Ajay's glitched reported value (xx) to 2.442.44 times the true Celsius expression. x=2.44×(x321.8)x = 2.44 \times \left(\frac{x - 32}{1.8}\right) Step 4: Execute the math to isolate the variable. Multiply both sides by 1.81.8 to clear the denominator and clean up the equation. 1.8x=2.44(x32)1.8x = 2.44(x - 32) Distribute the 2.442.44 into the parenthesis. 1.8x=2.44x78.081.8x = 2.44x - 78.08 Group the xx variables together to isolate the unknown. 2.44x1.8x=78.082.44x - 1.8x = 78.08 0.64x=78.080.64x = 78.08 Divide to secure the final stat. x=78.080.64x = \frac{78.08}{0.64} x=122x = 122 Final Answer: 122

Browse other topics