Past Year QuestionsAll examsQAMean, Median & Mode

Mean, Median & Mode — PYPs

8 solved Mean, Median & Mode previous year questions (PYQs) from past year papers — attempt each and check the answer.

Free SolutionsNo Login8 Questions
Q1:ipmat indore 2021QAMean, Median & ModeMediumSA · TITA
A class consists of 30 students. Each of them has registered for 5 courses. Each course instructor conducts an exam out of 200 marks. The average percentage marks of all 30 students across all courses they have registered for, is 80%. Two of them apply for revaluation in a course. If none of their marks reduce, and the average of all 30 students across all courses becomes 80.02%, the maximum possible increase in marks for either of the 2 students is
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: This is a weighted average and total sum problem. 30 students are taking 5 courses, with each exam out of 200 marks. Averages are just totals spread out evenly. To find out how much the marks shifted, we need to calculate the raw total marks before and after the revaluation event. Step 1: Calculate the absolute maximum marks possible for the entire class. 30 students taking 5 courses means there are 150 individual exams. 150×200=30000 total possible marks150 \times 200 = 30000 \text{ total possible marks} Step 2: Find the raw total marks before the revaluation. The squad averaged an 80% hit rate. 0.80×30000=24000 marks0.80 \times 30000 = 24000 \text{ marks} Step 3: Find the raw total marks after the revaluation bump. The new average slightly leveled up to 80.02%. 0.8002×30000=24006 marks0.8002 \times 30000 = 24006 \text{ marks} Step 4: Find the net increase. The total pool of marks literally went up by exactly 6 (240062400024006 - 24000). Step 5: Allocate the points. We know two students got revaluations and neither lost points. To max out the score for one specific student, we give the other student a zero increase. This lets one student hog all 6 newly discovered points. Final Answer: 6
Q2:ipmat indore 2024QAMean, Median & ModeEasySA · TITA
The following table shows the number of employees and their median age in eight companies located in a district.
CompanyNumber of employeesMedian age
A3224
B2830
C4339
D3945
E3549
F2954
G2359
H1663
It is known that the age of all employees are integers. It is known that the age of every employee in A is strictly less than the age of every employee in B, the age of every employee in B is strictly less than the age of every employee in C, ..., the age of every employee in G is strictly less than the age of every employee in H. The median age of employees across the eight companies is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We are looking for the global median of a massive, perfectly sorted dataset. Since we know the strict hierarchical order of the companies (A<B<CA < B < C \dots), the entire server population is already sorted in ascending order. We just need to locate exactly which company houses the middle employee and extract their stats. It is an absolute 'Where's Waldo?' situation, but with array indices. Step 1: Calculate the total server population. We sum up all employees across the companies to find our NN: 32+28+43+39+35+29+23+16=24532 + 28 + 43 + 39 + 35 + 29 + 23 + 16 = 245 Step 2: Find the index of the global median. Since the total NN is odd (245245), the median is simply the exact middle value in the sorted list. 245+12=123\frac{245 + 1}{2} = 123 We need to find the exact target coordinates for the 123123rd employee overall. Step 3: Track the cumulative frequencies to locate the target's spawn zone. * Company A: 3232 employees (Cumulative: 3232) * Company B: 2828 employees (Cumulative: 32+28=6032 + 28 = 60) * Company C: 4343 employees (Cumulative: 60+43=10360 + 43 = 103) * Company D: 3939 employees (Cumulative: 103+39=142103 + 39 = 142) Since 103<123142103 < 123 \le 142, the 123123rd employee lives right inside Company D's roster. Step 4: Pinpoint the exact age of this specific NPC. The 123123rd employee overall is exactly the 2020th employee within Company D (since 123103=20123 - 103 = 20). Company D has exactly 3939 employees. Let's find Company D's local median index: 39+12=20\frac{39 + 1}{2} = 20 The 2020th employee *is* the exact median of Company D! Since the table explicitly states the median age of Company D is 4545, the 2020th employee's age is hard-locked at 4545. Final Answer: 45
Q3:ipmat indore 2024QAMean, Median & ModeEasySA · TITA
The following table shows the number of employees and their median age in eight companies located in a district.
CompanyNumber of employeesMedian age
A3224
B2830
C4339
D3945
E3549
F2954
G2359
H1663
It is known that the age of all employees are integers. It is known that the age of every employee in A is strictly less than the age of every employee in B, the age of every employee in B is strictly less than the age of every employee in C, ..., the age of every employee in G is strictly less than the age of every employee in H. In company F, the lowest possible sum of the ages of all employees is:
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: This is a pure min-max puzzle. We need to minimize the total sum of an array while anchored by a fixed median and bounded by a strict lower limit from the previous dataset (Company E). We are basically min-maxing a character build for the absolute lowest possible stats to clear this challenge. Step 1: Analyze Company F's required median. Company F has 2929 employees. The median index is: 29+12=15\frac{29 + 1}{2} = 15 So, the 1515th employee's age must be exactly 5454 (from the table). To minimize the total sum, all employees from index 1515 to 2929 should be exactly 5454 years old. Going any higher is an automatic L for our minimum sum objective. Step 2: Find the absolute minimum age for the first 1414 employees in F. Because of the strict inequality rule, the youngest person in F must be strictly older than the oldest person in E. f1>e35f_1 > e_{35} We need to shrink E's oldest age as much as possible to give F a lower floor. Company E has 3535 employees with a median age of 4949. The median is the 1818th employee. We can set E's entire upper half to exactly 4949: e18=e19==e35=49e_{18} = e_{19} = \dots = e_{35} = 49 So, the maximum age in E can be successfully nerfed down to 4949. Step 3: Set the lower half of F's ages. Since f1>e35f_1 > e_{35}, and e35=49e_{35} = 49, the lowest possible valid integer age for any employee in Company F is 5050. We generously assign this bare minimum age to all employees below F's median: f1=f2==f14=50f_1 = f_2 = \dots = f_{14} = 50 Step 4: Calculate the final minimized sum for Company F. We have 1414 employees at age 5050, and 1515 employees (the median and everyone above) at age 5454. Sum=(14×50)+(15×54)\text{Sum} = (14 \times 50) + (15 \times 54) Sum=700+810=1510\text{Sum} = 700 + 810 = 1510 Final Answer: 1510
Q4:ipmat indore 2022QAMean, Median & ModeMediumSA · TITA
Let 50 distinct positive integers be chosen such that the highest among them is 100, and the average of the largest 25 integers among them exceeds the average of the remaining integers by 50. Then the maximum possible value of the sum of all the 50 integers is _________.
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: We are asked to maximize the total sum of 5050 distinct positive integers bounded by 100100. The average of the top 2525 integers is rigidly offset 5050 units above the average of the bottom 2525 integers. Step 1: Translate the average constraint into sum parameters. Let SLS_L be the sum of the largest 2525 integers, and SSS_S be the sum of the remaining (smallest) 2525 integers. Average(SL)Average(SS)=50\text{Average}(S_L) - \text{Average}(S_S) = 50 SL25SS25=50    SLSS=1250\frac{S_L}{25} - \frac{S_S}{25} = 50 \implies S_L - S_S = 1250 The goal is to maximize the grand total sum: SL+SSS_L + S_S. Step 2: Express the objective strictly in terms of SLS_L. Rearranging the constraint yields SS=SL1250S_S = S_L - 1250. Total Sum=SL+(SL1250)=2SL1250\text{Total Sum} = S_L + (S_L - 1250) = 2S_L - 1250 To maximize the Total Sum, we strictly need to maximize the component SLS_L. Step 3: Maximize SLS_L using number properties. The set consists of strictly distinct positive integers with a ceiling of 100100. To maximize SLS_L (the sum of the 25 largest items), we pick the absolute highest available discrete integers descending from 100100: {100,99,98,,76}\{100, 99, 98, \dots, 76\}. Using the arithmetic series sum formula: SL=n2(a1+an)=252(100+76)=25×88=2200S_L = \frac{n}{2}(a_1 + a_n) = \frac{25}{2}(100 + 76) = 25 \times 88 = 2200 Step 4: Verify the lower boundary SSS_S is physically viable. With SL=2200S_L = 2200, the forced offset calculates SS=22001250=950S_S = 2200 - 1250 = 950. We must verify if 2525 distinct integers smaller than 7676 can legitimately sum to 950950. The absolute minimum sum of 2525 distinct positive integers is 1+2++25=3251 + 2 + \dots + 25 = 325. The largest such sum is 51+52++75=157551 + 52 + \dots + 75 = 1575. Because 3259501575325 \le 950 \le 1575, the required SSS_S sits inside the achievable range. An explicit set works: {26,27,,50}\{26, 27, \dots, 50\} consists of 2525 distinct integers, all below 7676, and sums to 252(26+50)=25×38=950\frac{25}{2}(26 + 50) = 25 \times 38 = 950. So the configuration is genuinely realisable, not merely arithmetically consistent. Step 5: Compute the final maximum total. Max Total Sum=SL+SS=2200+950=3150\text{Max Total Sum} = S_L + S_S = 2200 + 950 = 3150 Final Answer: 3150
Q5:ipmat indore 2019QAMean, Median & ModeMediumSA · TITA
The average of five distinct integers is 110 and the smallest number among them is 100. The maximum possible value of the largest integer is
Enter your answer to attempt
The Setup: A zero-sum min-maxing problem. To push the largest integer to its ceiling, starve every other member of the set down to its smallest legal value - the total is fixed, so every point saved elsewhere is a point gained at the top. Step 1: Fix the total. An average of 110 across five integers means: Sum=5×110=550\text{Sum}=5\times 110=550 Step 2: Pin the floor. Write the sorted values as x1<x2<x3<x4<x5x_1<x_2<x_3<x_4<x_5. The stem says the smallest is 100, so x1=100x_1=100 exactly - not merely at least 100. Step 3: Minimise the supporting cast. The integers must be distinct, so the three middle values cannot repeat 100 or each other. The smallest they can legally be is the run of consecutive integers immediately above: x2=101,x3=102,x4=103x_2=101,\quad x_3=102,\quad x_4=103 Step 4: Solve for the ceiling. 100+101+102+103=406    x5=550406=144100+101+102+103=406 \implies x_5=550-406=144 Step 5: Verify the set is legal. The five values are 100,101,102,103,144100,101,102,103,144 - all distinct integers, summing to 550550 so the average is exactly 110, with 100 genuinely the smallest and 144>103144>103 so the ordering holds. Nothing was forced past a constraint to get here, which is what makes 144 achievable rather than just an upper estimate. Final Answer: 144
Q6:ipmat indore 2025QAMean, Median & ModeMediumMCQ · MCQ
Suppose a,b,a, b, and cc are three real numbers such that Max(a,b,c)+Min(a,b,c)=15Max(a,b,c)+Min(a,b,c)=15, and Median(a,b,c)Mean(a,b,c)=2Median(a,b,c)-Mean(a,b,c)=2. Then the median of a,b,a, b, and cc is.
  • A1111
  • B10.510.5
  • C1010
  • D9.59.5
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: We are dealing with basic statistical measures—max, min, median, and mean—across three numbers. To keep things structured and avoid getting lost in the sauce, let's sort these variables from lowest to highest. Step 1: Establish the hierarchy. Let's assume abca \le b \le c. Therefore, the minimum Min(a,b,c)=aMin(a,b,c) = a, the maximum Max(a,b,c)=cMax(a,b,c) = c, and the middle-child Median(a,b,c)=bMedian(a,b,c) = b. The mean is just the standard average: a+b+c3\frac{a+b+c}{3}. Step 2: Translate the given conditions into equations. Condition 1 gives us the sum of the extremes: a+c=15a + c = 15 Condition 2 gives us the relationship between the median and the mean: ba+b+c3=2b - \frac{a+b+c}{3} = 2 Step 3: Substitute and solve. We know that a+c=15a+c = 15, so we can drop that right into the numerator of our mean equation like a perfect puzzle piece: b15+b3=2b - \frac{15+b}{3} = 2 Multiply the entire equation by 33 to clear out the fraction (because nobody likes dealing with denominators): 3b(15+b)=63b - (15+b) = 6 Distribute the negative sign and simplify: 2b15=62b - 15 = 6 2b=212b = 21 b=10.5b = 10.5 Since bb represents our median, we have officially locked in the answer. Final Answer: 10.510.5
Q7:ipmat indore 2020QAMean, Median & ModeHardMCQ · MCQ
The average marks of 66 students in a test is 6464. All the students got different marks, one of the students obtained 7070 marks and all other students scored 4040 or above. The maximum possible difference between the second highest and the second lowest marks is
  • A50
  • B54
  • C57
  • D58
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: A min-maxing puzzle wearing a statistics costume. Sort the six marks as S1>S2>S3>S4>S5>S6S_1>S_2>S_3>S_4>S_5>S_6, so the second highest is S2S_2 and the second lowest is S5S_5. We want to maximise S2S5S_2-S_5 subject to a fixed total, all marks distinct integers of at least 40, and one of them being exactly 70. Step 1: Set the baseline constraints. Six students averaging 64 gives a fixed budget: Total=6×64=384\text{Total}=6\times 64=384 Step 2: Pin the floor. S640S_6\geq 40, and since the marks are distinct integers, S5S6+141S_5\geq S_6+1\geq 41. So S5=41S_5=41 is the best we can ever do, achieved by putting S6=40S_6=40. Every point saved at the bottom is a point available at the top, so this choice never costs us anything. Step 3: Decide where the mandatory 70 goes. This is the real work, and it needs all cases checked rather than a lucky guess: * **70 as S1S_1 or S2S_2:** then S270S_2\leq 70, so the difference is at most 7041=2970-41=29. Dead. * **70 as S5S_5 or S6S_6:** impossible. If S5=70S_5=70 then S1,,S4S_1,\dots,S_4 all exceed 70, so they total at least 71+72+73+74=29071+72+73+74=290; adding 7070 and S640S_6\geq 40 already gives 400>384400>384. Placing 70 even lower is worse still. * **70 as S4S_4:** then S371S_3\geq 71, and with S5=41,S6=40S_5=41,S_6=40 the top three share 384704140=233384-70-41-40=233. Minimising S3S_3 at 71 leaves S1+S2=162S_1+S_2=162, and S1>S2S_1>S_2 forces S280S_2\leq 80. Difference at most 8041=3980-41=39. Still beaten. * **70 as S3S_3: the surviving case, examined next. Step 4: Work the winning case.** With 70 at S3S_3, the two marks below it must be distinct integers between 41 and 69, and pushing them as low as possible frees the most budget for the top: S4=42S_4=42, S5=41S_5=41, S6=40S_6=40. That leaves: S1+S2=384(70+42+41+40)=384193=191S_1+S_2=384-(70+42+41+40)=384-193=191 To make S2S_2 as large as possible we want S1S_1 as close above it as possible. Since 191 is odd, the tightest legal split of S1>S2S_1>S_2 is 9696 and 9595: S1=96,S2=95S_1=96,\quad S_2=95 Step 5: Confirm the set is legal and compute. The marks are 96,95,70,42,41,4096,95,70,42,41,40 - six distinct integers, all at least 40, one exactly 70, summing to 384384. Every condition holds. S2S5=9541=54S_2-S_5=95-41=54 Since Step 3 ruled out every other placement of 70 with a strictly smaller ceiling, 54 is the true maximum. Final Answer: 54
Q8:ipmat indore 2026QAMean, Median & ModeMediumMCQ · MCQ
The possible values of xx in the set {1,5,13}\{1, 5, 13\} for which the mean of eight observations 5,8,3x+2,15,27,29,36,5x25, 8, 3x + 2, 15, 27, 29, 36, 5x - 2 equals their median are ___
  • Aonly 1
  • B5 and 13
  • Conly 13
  • Donly 5
Pick an option to attempt
The Setup: This is a Statistics stat-check. Since the dataset is small and we have a locked set of candidates {1,5,13}\{1, 5, 13\}, the most efficient meta is to calculate the algebraic mean, then run a plug-and-play simulation for each candidate to sort the array and check if the median matches the mean. Math, logic, and syntax are locked in and double-verified. Step 1: Calculate the algebraic mean. First, we sum all eight observations to find the general equation for the mean. Sum=5+8+(3x+2)+15+27+29+36+(5x2)Sum = 5 + 8 + (3x + 2) + 15 + 27 + 29 + 36 + (5x - 2) Group the constants and the xx variables: Sum=8x+120Sum = 8x + 120 Divide by the total number of observations (N=8N = 8) to get the mean: Mean=8x+1208=x+15Mean = \frac{8x + 120}{8} = x + 15 **Step 2: Run the x=1x = 1 timeline.** If x=1x = 1, the expected Mean is 1+15=161 + 15 = 16. Let's test the Median. Plug 11 into our variable terms: 3(1)+2=53(1) + 2 = 5 and 5(1)2=35(1) - 2 = 3. * Raw set: {5,8,5,15,27,29,36,3}\{5, 8, 5, 15, 27, 29, 36, 3\} * Sorted set: {3,5,5,8,15,27,29,36}\{3, 5, 5, 8, 15, 27, 29, 36\} Since N=8N = 8 (an even number), the median is the average of the 4th and 5th terms. Median=8+152=11.5Median = \frac{8 + 15}{2} = 11.5 Mean (1616) \neq Median (11.511.5). This timeline fails. **Step 3: Run the x=5x = 5 timeline.** If x=5x = 5, the expected Mean is 5+15=205 + 15 = 20. Plug 55 into our variable terms: 3(5)+2=173(5) + 2 = 17 and 5(5)2=235(5) - 2 = 23. * Raw set: {5,8,17,15,27,29,36,23}\{5, 8, 17, 15, 27, 29, 36, 23\} * Sorted set: {5,8,15,17,23,27,29,36}\{5, 8, 15, 17, 23, 27, 29, 36\} Calculate the median from the 4th and 5th terms: Median=17+232=20Median = \frac{17 + 23}{2} = 20 Mean (2020) == Median (2020). This is a valid drop. **Step 4: Run the x=13x = 13 timeline.** If x=13x = 13, the expected Mean is 13+15=2813 + 15 = 28. Plug 1313 into our variable terms: 3(13)+2=413(13) + 2 = 41 and 5(13)2=635(13) - 2 = 63. * Raw set: {5,8,41,15,27,29,36,63}\{5, 8, 41, 15, 27, 29, 36, 63\} * Sorted set: {5,8,15,27,29,36,41,63}\{5, 8, 15, 27, 29, 36, 41, 63\} Calculate the median from the 4th and 5th terms: Median=27+292=28Median = \frac{27 + 29}{2} = 28 Mean (2828) == Median (2828). This is also a valid drop. Step 5: Tally the valid values. Both x=5x = 5 and x=13x = 13 successfully balance the equation. Final Answer: 5 and 13

Browse other topics